Legal Opinion

In re Will of Wolfe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 8, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdahs, J.

Tbe presiding judge, we presume, based bis peremptory-instruction on tbe legal inference tbat tbe earlier paper-writing was revoked by tbe one of later date, for .it is not at all probable tbat it was bis purpose to withdraw from tbe jury any evidence tending to, show tbe erasure of tbe original signature to tbe older instrument; We are therefore called upon to decide whether tbe instruction given is a necessary deduction from tbe facts disclosed by tbe record.

A will may be revoked by a subsequent instrument executed solely for tbat purpose, or by a subsequent will containing a revoking…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McIver v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Pilley v. . SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Page v. . FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. In Re Venable's WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Dicks v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of McCauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Westfeldt v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. In Re the Will of CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. In Re the Will of NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Adler v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API