Legal Opinion

In Re Venable's Will

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ApplicatioN by S. L. Venable for the probate of the holograph will of Haywood Venable, deceased, in connection with a subsequent will, heard by Judge W. S. O’B. Robinson, and a jury, at Spring Term, 1900, of Stoicbs Superior Court. From order denying probate, propounder appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

EaiRCLOth, O. J.

On August 29, 1891, Haywood Vena-•ble executed what purports to be his holograph will, found among his valuable papers, after his death. On March 15, 1899, he executed another will a few days before his death, which was probated and duly recorded on March 24, 1899.

S. L. Venable, one of the devisees in the holograph will, of-ffered the same for probate and recordation on May 18, 1899. An issue of devisavit vel non as to the holograph will was framed and submitted to a jury at Spring Term, 1900, of the Superior Court, whose verdict was against the pro-pounder of the said will,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Coe v. KniffenNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  2. Smith v. FennerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1812
  3. White v. . Casten and WifeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. MilesNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Blackford v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Westfeldt v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Lasier v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. In Re the Will of CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API