Legal Opinion

Herzman Scarfs, Inc. v. Baar & Beards, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

Motion for injunction pendente lite is denied. Plaintiff seeks to restrain defendant from committing alleged acts of unfair competition. The defendant, a competitor of plaintiff, has recently commenced to import from Japan and sell scarfs which are very similar in shape and design to plaintiff’s Japanese imported ballerina type design scarfs. Plaintiff’s scarfs bear a single label, “ Carol Stanley ”, and defendant’s scarfs bear both a label identifying them as “Top Hit ” fashions and also a black tag bearing in gold letters the words ‘ ‘ Top Hit ’ ’. Plaintiff makes no claim that it has a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. Tabor v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Chas. D. Briddell, Inc. v. Alglobe Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Mavco, Inc. v. Hampden Sales Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Speedry Products, Inc. v. Dri Mark Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Speedry Products, Inc. v. Dri Mark Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Newburgh Moire Co., Inc. v. Superior Moire Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
  4. Catalina, Inc. v. GanisNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Robert Simmons, Inc. v. Simmons-King, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API