Legal Opinion

United States v. Bruton

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 2, 1984No. 45189; NMCM 81-3001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

This case provides another example of inordinate and unexplained delay in post-trial review.

On September 10, 1980, a military judge sitting as a special court-martial at Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia, tried appellant on charges and specifications alleging 3 unauthorized absences, 30 failures to go, missing movement, and possessing marihuana. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, Bruton pleaded guilty to the unauthorized absences, 15 failures to go, and possession of marihuana; and the Government did not go forward on the remaining charges. After entering…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ClevidenceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. ShelyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. SuttonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. BauerbachArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. SkaarU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. HenryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. MiramontesU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. WilliamsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API