Legal Opinion

Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Witt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1993PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company filed suit for declaratory judgment that the policy of insurance issued to Roland Witt provided no coverage for collision damage sustained to a rental automobile operated by Witt while under the influence of alcohol. On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted Witt judgment declaring there was coverage; the Court of Appeals reversed, holding there was no coverage. The record supports the trial court’s construction of the insurance contract that there was coverage.

Tennessee Farmers Mutual issued to Roland…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hamblen County v. City of MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Estate of Adkins v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. WattsTennessee Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Naifeh v. Valley Forge Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. McKnightTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. TorpocoTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. King v. PopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API