Legal Opinion

Pope v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1939No. 10387PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mergenthaler Linotype Company, a New York concern, sued Walter E. Pope for damages for alleged breach of a written contract, executed and alleged to have been breached in the year 1925.

It appears that Pope owned a used linotype machine in his newspaper office at Corpus Christi, and contracted with the Linotype Company to purchase from it two linotype machines, for a money consideration of $3,005, to be evidenced by specified installment notes, and Pope's old machine, which he agreed to deliver to the company properly boxed and shipped, f. o. b. Corpus Christi.

It is conceded that Pope executed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. StraussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Southern Discount Co. v. RoseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. J. B. Colt Co. v. McBurnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Evans v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Kane v. Union State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API