Legal Opinion
May v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 30, 2012No. 11-774 CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.1
On December 14, 2009, Morris May (“Plaintiff’) received a traffic citation in Ohio, which he apparently contested. See November 16, 2011 App. To Proceed In Forma Pauperis. After an adverse ruling by an Ohio traffic court, Plaintiff appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court on November 18, 2010 (Compl. ¶4), and did so again on June 13, 2011 (Compl. ¶ 6); July 6, 2011 (Compl. ¶ 8); July 15, 2011 (Compl. ¶ 10); and July 25, 2011 (Compl. ¶ 12). These appeals were styled as writs of mandamus to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Kortlander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Manuel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.