Legal Opinion

Easton v. County of Alameda

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1937No. S. F. 15732PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

This is an action for the recovery of taxes. The complaint alleges that the city of Oakland and the county of Alameda erroneously and illegally collected certain amounts which were paid by the appellant Easton involuntarily and to avoid the penalties imposed by the law for delinquency. Appellant Easton Building Company filed a complaint in intervention. The trial court granted a motion for a nonsuit and thereafter gave judgment for the respondents.

The appellant Easton is the owner of an office building leased by him to Easton Building Company for a term of 30 years commencing in 1923. This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Stewart Law & Collection Co. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re Estate of BackestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. IBM Personal Pension Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Schoderbek v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Mayhew Tech Center, Phase II v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Grotenhuis v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API