Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Schoderbek v. Carlson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1980No. Civ. 48929PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Fifteen named plaintiffs in their own behalf and on behalf of persons similarly situated brought a class action for declaratory relief, writ of mandate, preliminary and permanent injunction and damages, naming the Assessor of Santa Clara County, Alfred Carlson, the former Assessor of Santa Clara County, the Director of Finance of Santa Clara County, the Tax Collector of Santa Clara County, the Board of Supervisors of Santa Clara County, the State of California and the State Board of Equalization as defendants. Proposition 13 (art. XIII A of the Cal. Const.), an initiative…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Security-First National Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Neecke v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Ardon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Farrar v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API