United States v. Yu
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, District Judge.
Tbis case comes before tbe court on a motion to suppress evidence. Tbe facts are as follows:
Narcotic Agent Patterson received information from a Chinaman in California to tbe effect that smoking opium was being shipped into Arizona to a Chinaman living in tbe rear of 136 South Granite street, Prescott, Ariz., and being there distributed. Tbe information was purely hearsay, and tbe *358narcotic agent had no personal knowledge of any of these facts. Acting upon this hearsay information, Narcotic Agents Patterson and’Berry and a deputy sheriff named Kent went to the residence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Contee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- McDade v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Sam ChinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
- United States v. ContradesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1961
- United States v. ShultzDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.