Legal Opinion

In Re Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2004No. 97-BG-327PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board), having found that Richard P. Brown, a member of the District of Columbia Bar, was convicted of a serious crime and that he violated Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for one year with a fitness requirement for reinstatement. Neither Brown nor Bar Counsel filed objections or exceptions to the Board’s report in this court. “[I]n such circumstances our review of the Board’s recommendation is ‘especially deferential.’” In re…

2Cases cited4 opinions

In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
In Re FowlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
In Re PerrinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

In Re DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
In Re PondsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
In re NwadikeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
In Re RigasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
In re WheelerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.