Harewood v. Sarah Allen Home for the Aged, Inc. (In Re Sarah Allen Home Inc.)

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The issue in the adversary proceeding at bench is whether, on motion of the defendant, we should require the attorneys for the 74 plaintiffs to produce warrants of attorney evidencing that they, in fact, represent each of the named plaintiffs. We conclude that the attorneys for the plaintiffs are not required to do so.

The facts of the instant case are as follows: 1 Sarah Allen Home, Inc. (“the bankrupt”) filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Act 2 on September 26, 1979. On February 19, 1980, an adversary complaint was filed by…