Legal Opinion

Knoxville Ry. & Light Co. v. O'Fallen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM KNOX. Error to the Circuit Court, Knox County. — Von A. Huffakeb, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

It is true that, where a public service corporation takes land under condemnation proceedings, it is not a trespasser, and cannot he sued as such, but the remedy of the landowner is that only which is prescribed by the charter. Mitchell v. Turnpike Co., 22 Tenn. (3 Humph), 456; Tennessee & Alabama R. R. Co. v. Adams, 40 Tenn. (3 Head), 596; Colcough v. Nashville & N. W. R. Co., 39 Tenn. (2 Head), 171; Simms v. Memphis, Clarksville & Louisville R. Co., 59 Tenn. (12 Heisk.), 621. The same result would necessarily follow where condemnation proceedings were instituted under the general statutes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Walker v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Saunders v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Lewisberg & Northern R. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Whitlow v. Hardin Co., Tenn.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  3. Henry v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
  4. Tuggle v. Southern Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Nason v. South Memphis Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API