Knoxville Ry. & Light Co. v. O'Fallen
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Error to the Circuit Court, Knox County. — Von A. Huffakeb, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
It is true that, where a public service corporation takes land under condemnation proceedings, it is not a trespasser, and cannot he sued as such, but the remedy of the landowner is that only which is prescribed by the charter. Mitchell v. Turnpike Co., 22 Tenn. (3 Humph), 456; Tennessee & Alabama R. R. Co. v. Adams, 40 Tenn. (3 Head), 596; Colcough v. Nashville & N. W. R. Co., 39 Tenn. (2 Head), 171; Simms v. Memphis, Clarksville & Louisville R. Co., 59 Tenn. (12 Heisk.), 621. The same result would necessarily follow where condemnation proceedings were instituted under the general statutes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lieberman v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Walker v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
- Saunders v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Campbell v. Lewisberg & Northern R. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Whitlow v. Hardin Co., Tenn.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
- Henry v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
- Tuggle v. Southern Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- Nason v. South Memphis Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.