Legal Opinion

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2005No. 75879-4PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 This court is asked to determine if constitutional due process principles require individual notification to a landowner whose land is designated a potential annexation area under an adjacent town’s comprehensive plan. The Court of Appeals held Chevron U.S.A., Inc.’s (Chevron) due process rights were not implicated here because the town of Woodway’s comprehensive plan amendments do not infringe upon Chevron’s property rights. We agree with the appellate court’s reasoning and affirm.

C. Johnson, J.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 Point Wells is a 97-acre parcel of land owned exclusively by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steven J. Harris v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Holbrook, Inc. v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Holbrook, Inc. v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. CHEVRON USA INC. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cory And Melissa Jespersen, V Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Carlisle v. COLUMBIA IRR. DIST.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Carlisle v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Chevron v. PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENTWashington Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API