Legal Opinion
Holbrook, Inc. v. Clark County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 28, 2002No. 27216-4-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J.
Holbrook, Inc., appeals from a judgment denying it relief in an action challenging Clark County’s designation of Holbrook’s property as forest resource land under the Growth Management Act (GMA). At issue is whether the County gave Holbrook adequate constitutional and statutory notice of its action.1 Holding that no statute, regulation, or constitutional principle required Clark County to individually notify nonresident landowners of the GMA process, we affirm.
FACTS
The parties stipulated to the following facts below. Holbrook is a Washington corporation with a principal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Edmonds Shopping Center Associates v. City of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Holbrook, Inc. v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Chevron v. PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENTWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- CHEVRON USA INC. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.