Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Mid-State Fertilizer Co. sold fertilizer in mid-state Illinois. It needed money to buy supplies, pay its workers, and run the business until it could collect from customers. Mid-State arranged for revolving credit from the Exchange National Bank of Chicago, which promised to lend Mid-State 70% of its inventory and receivables to a maximum of $2 million; Mid-State promised to direct its customers to make all payments to a postal box that Exchange would control (the “lock box”). Exchange *1334would retrieve the checks and deposit them to an account from which it alone…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by383 opinions
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Reddy v. Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
378 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.