Legal Opinion

David R. Williams v. Harold Mordkofsky

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 17, 1990No. 89-7133PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TIMBERS.

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:

Appellants in this legal malpractice action are David R. and Deanna M. Williams and the corporation they own jointly, Inter-mountain Broadcasting, Inc. (“Intermountain”). Appellees are Harold Mordkofsky, his law firm, Blooston & Mordkofsky, and several other partners of that firm.

Appellants appeal from an order entered on May 5, 1989, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Oliver Gasch, District Judge, granting summary judgment in favor of appellees on all counts. The district court held that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bussineau v. President of Georgetown CollegeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Kuwait Airways Corporation v. American Security Bank, N.A. And First American Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. HazardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Florence Goldman v. August BequaiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Capitol Services Management v. Vesta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API