Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Masto v. Montero

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2008No. 51538PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we address the residency requirements for district court judicial candidates and, in particular, whether a candidate for district judge must reside within the judicial district in which he or she is seeking office. Because district judges are recognized as “state officers” under NRS 293.109, we conclude that a candidate who satisfies NRS 3.060’s mandate that a district court judicial candidate must be a Nevada state resident for at least two years preceding the election is eligible for election within any judicial district within the state under NRS 293.1755(l)’s…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc. v. Nevada State Labor CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Brockliss v. JepsenNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Phillips v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sowers v. Forest Hills SubdivisionNevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API