Washburn Crosby Co. v. Nee

OTIS, District Judge.

On July 1, 1935, the plaintiff filed its bill of complaint in this case. Thereafter, on July 30, 1935, by leave of court, it filed its amended bill. It was alleged in this amended bill (as it bad been al*752leged in the original bill) that the plaintiff is a processor of wheat as defined in the Agricultural ’Adjustment Act (chapter 25, 48 Stat. 31 [see 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.]), and as such subject to the taxing provisions of that act and of the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture proclaimed pursuant to the act. It was alleged that the defendant, ' the collector of…