Legal Opinion

Acme-Evans Co. v. Smith

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided January 22, 1936No. 1691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALTZELL, District Judge.

On January 7, 1936, West Baking Company, hereinafter referred to as “the baking company,” filed a motion for leave to intervene in the above-entitled cause, such motion being accompanied by a copy of the proposed bill of intervention. The question before the court is whether or not the baking company should be granted such leave. The baking company alleges that it has paid, as a part of the purchase price of flour and other processed commodities of the complainant, a, sum equal to the amount of the processing tax levied by the act challenged, in addition to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. FontenotSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Wayne County Produce Co. v. Duffy-Mott Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shannon v. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Independent Linen Service Co. v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Washburn Crosby Co. v. NeeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API