Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hand

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 3, 1981No. 38,912; ACM S24767PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

We granted review (9 M.J. 138) to determine whether the authorities below complied with United States v. Goode, 1 M.J. 3 (C.M.A.1975). Appellant submits that the service of the post-trial review was deficient for several reasons. However, we need only address one of those reasons. Government counsel conceded before the court below that the convening authority had abused his discretion under the circumstances presented by rejecting a defense-requested delay for the purpose of responding to the post-trial review. That court rejected the concession, noting “the rule of…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. Mariscal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. McNamaraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. HandU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  5. United States v. GorhamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. McElhaneyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  2. United States v. MartinezArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  3. United States v. BudkaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  4. United States v. LuedtkeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API