Legal Opinion

United States v. Budka

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 22, 2015No. 14-0660/ARPublished

1Opinion of the Court

CCA 20120435. On further consideration of the granted issues (74 M.J. 55 (C.A.A.F. Oct. 23, 2014)), and the briefs of the parties, we first conclude that the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals did not abuse its discretion and did not violate the principle of party presentation, as outlined in Greenlaw v. United States, 554 U.S. 237, 243-44 (2008), when it .summarily affirmed the finding of guilty to the offense of aggravated assault after the Government conceded that the factual predicate for that offense had not been met. Under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. United States v. EmmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. McNamaraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. WilleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API