Legal Opinion

Corliss v. Davidson & Case Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1940No. 34,809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for damages for malicious and fraudulent prosecution of a civil action. Judgment was for the defendant, sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff appeals.

The petition stated that plaintiff on August 3, 1936, held a fee-*328simple title to a quarter section of land in Blaine county, Oklahoma; that his son, W. B. Corliss, bought lumber in the amount of $50.56 from defendant and gave a check for $60.16, receiving in addition to the lumber $9.60 in cash; that the name of plaintiff was forged to this check; that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Chamblin v. ChamblinIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Simpson v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. National Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Shultz v. ShultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Haas v. HaasSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Tomkins v. TomkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Rati v. Pittsburg Finance & Thrift Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API