Legal Opinion
Hiatt v. Schreiber
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 14, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-K-953PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Jack and Belinda Hiatt, seek recovery for breach of a property insurance policy from the agents and underwriters of that policy. The complaint alleges that in October, 1975 the Hiatts purchased insurance on their 1975 Mack Truck from defendants Sovereign Marine & General Insurance Company Ltd., underwriters at Lloyds, London and Home Insurance Company through their agents, the three defendants Schreiber. Subsequently the truck was damaged and the defendants have refused to settle the Hiatts’ claim. The Hiatts’ seek recovery in the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- TV Communications Network, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Wheeler v. ReeseColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Fostvedt v. United States, Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Simmons v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. WiseDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.