Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Munoz

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1959No. A-7138PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent sought from the district court a writ of mandamus to compel the City of San Antonio and certain city officials to issue to respondent, Herlinda Rodriguez Munoz, a “City Retail Dealer’s on Premises Beer License.” The relief sought was denied. Respondents appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals and that court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 318 S.W. 2d 741. City of San Antonio and its officers have applied for a writ of error.

The case is one in which the Court has potential jurisdiction. Articles 1728 and 1821, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Civil Statutes. But petitioners are not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Munoz v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Royer v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Trad v. GENERAL CRUDE OIL COMPANYTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Robert Driscoll & Julia Driscoll & Robert Driscoll, Jr. Foundation v. Nueces CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Cecil v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cecil v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API