Legal Opinion

Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Grays

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1938No. 7011PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Martin

delivered the opinion for the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

The factual background of the case before us is fully stated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, affirming judgment of the trial court.

In view of the disposition we make of this case, it will not be necessary to do more than briefly mention a few of the controlling facts.

Plaintiffs in error filed a plea of privilege which was overruled. A receiver was then appointed. Upon appeal from these orders, they were both reversed and cause remanded. Tidal Oil Co. v. Grays et al., 54 S. W. (2d) 1043, 64 S. W. (2d)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. GraysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Tidal Oil Co. v. GraysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Jackson v. Fontaine's Clinics, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ex Parte Winfield ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Moore v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Humble Exploration Co., Inc. v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API