Legal Opinion

Cecil v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1991No. D-0100Published

1Opinion of the Court

804 S.W.2d 509 (1991)

Mildred CECIL, Petitioner,

v.

Charles Madison SMITH, Respondent.

No. D-0100.

Supreme Court of Texas.

February 27, 1991.

M. Keith Dollahite, Tyler, Michael G. George, Athens, for petitioner.

James A. Attaway, Jr., Quitman, for respondent.

OPINION

HIGHTOWER, Justice.

The issue before this court is whether a timely filed motion for new trial which is overruled by operation of law preserves appellate complaints of no evidence and factual insufficiency of the evidence to support a jury finding. The trial court, after a jury trial, rendered judgment concerning ownership of a certificate…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cecil v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  4. Cherne Industries, Inc. v. MagallanesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Pirtle v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API