Legal Opinion

Hellesvig v. Hellesvig

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1983No. TC 16-80-11120 CA A21816, SC 28991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff by this proceeding seeks to partition a parcel of real property owned by him and the defendant as tenants in common. The trial court granted summary judgment for defendant, concluding that this suit was barred because of a prior domestic relations proceeding between the same parties in which plaintiff had unsuccessfully sought similar relief. The Court of Appeals reversed; it held that this suit was not barred inasmuch as the circuit court in the prior proceeding had concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the partition question. 59 Or App 356, 650 P2d 1072 (1982).

Plainti…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Garnett v. GarnettOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Sibold v. SiboldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Killam v. KillamOregon Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Abraham v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Weber v. GaltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API