Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Goff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 1987No. 85-0630C; CA A40185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

In a dissolution judgment entered in 1973, the parties were given an undivided interest as tenants in common of 300 shares of stock in Hermiston Broadcasting Company. Husband was given the right to vote the stock and to exercise other incidents of management over it. Wife brought this action to partition the shares. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted husband’s motion. We reverse and remand.

Husband, relying on Rousseau and Rousseau, 76 Or App 528, 709 P2d 764 (1985), argued in the trial court that the court had no power to modify the property division provisions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fike v. SharerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Killam v. KillamOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In re the Marriage of RousseauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Hellesvig v. HellesvigOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hurst v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Menten and DeatherageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Miller v. FulopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Weber v. GaltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API