Legal Opinion

Bell v. Town of Oyster Bay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), entered June 5, 1995, which granted the plaintiff’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the plaintiffs application is denied, and the complaint is dismissed.

*283It is well settled that an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim must be brought within the one year and 90-day limitation period provided for by General Municipal Law § 50-i |(see, General…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Carr v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Guillan v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Dua v. Suffolk CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mcsherry v. Hawthorne SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Jagmohan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Striplin v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API