Legal Opinion

Meyer Sletzinger v. Frank H. Lincoln, William P. Schneider and George B. Spero

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8156PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to Lincoln, Schneider and Spero (Lincoln et al.), in interference No. 91,- 155, involving Lincoln et al. application serial No. 753,157, filed August 4, 1958, entitled “Organic Compound and Process” and Sletzinger application serial No. 746,661, filed July 7, 1958, entitled “16-substituted Steroids.”

The real parties in interest are Merck & Co., Inc., assignee of Sletzinger, and the Upjohn Company, assignee of Lincoln et al.

The invention involves steroid compounds of the pregnene…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robert Harvey Rines v. Harry C. MorganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Dickinson v. SwinehartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
  3. Powell v. PoupitchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. Martus v. HeiseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Farmer v. SchweyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  2. K & K Jump Start/Chargers, Inc. v. Schumacher Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000
  3. United States v. David B. TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API