Legal Opinion

Mayhew v. West Virginia Oil & Oil Land Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia

Decided July 1, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On motion (1) to confirm sale made to Charles H. Shattuck, March 17, 1885; (2) for a decree against J. N Camden, personally, for the difference between his bid of $173,050, October 1, 1884, and that of Shattuck, March 17, 1885, of $119,100; (3) to set aside order entered November 3, 1884, canceling the bond of Thompson and Payne and Chancellor, and directing a return of the deposit of $10,000.

1Opinion of the Court

Watte, Chief Justice.

The facts on which these motions depend are as follows:

Prior to the entry of the decree of November 17, 1883, an instrument in writing was prepared for the signatures of J. N. Camden, J. H. Carrington, W . II. Beach, A. C. Worth, Toledo National Bank, R. S. Blair, B. B. Valentine, and Heman Loomis, purporting to be a contract between these parties to protect their several interests in the suit, and to insure a sale of the property for an amount sufficient to pay the debts due to them respectively, in full. This paper was signed by Camden, Carrington, Worth, Valentine, and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. QuintardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  2. Coal City House Furnishing Co. v. HogueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
  3. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Roanoke Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1897
  4. Sampson v. Camperdown Cotton MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1894
  5. Robyn v. PickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API