Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Camperdown Cotton Mills

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided December 21, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was a suit by O. H. Sampson & Co. against the Camper-down Cotton Mills for the foreclosure of a mortgage. Vardry E. Mollee filed an intervening petition. A rule to show cause was issued to the plaintiff, purchaser at the foreclosure sale, to which he filed a return.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

The Camperdown Cotton Mills, a corporation, executed to the complainant in March, 1893, a mortgage of its personal property. The description of the property mortgaged *940begins thus: “125 H. P. Buckeye automatic cut-off engine, two steam boilers, one steam .pipe, one two-beater opener, 56 36-inch Wellman cords, with railway, troughs, and fixtures complete;” going on and giving in minute detail, article by article, the machinery and appliances used in a cotton mill. Alter this long and minute detail come these words in a separate paragraph: “All personal property of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Ness v. PacardSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Blossom v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Kutter v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. Freeman v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In re Montello Brick WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API