Legal Opinion

Mohamed Fadul v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 2015No. 13-CT-226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Senior Judge:

Mr. Fadul appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), in violation of D.C.Code § 50-2206.11 (2012 Repl.). He argues that the trial court abused its discretion in declining to sanction the government for its failure to provide him with tapes of the responding officers’ radio call, that the evidence is insufficient to show that he “operated]” or was “in physical control of’ the vehicle within the meaning of the statute, D.C.Code § 50-2206.11 (2012 Repl.), and that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. We disagree, and affirm.

I. Facts and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wainwright v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. JESUS A. HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Ulcenat v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API