Levy v. Mravlag
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Argued before a single justice under the statute.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beegest, J.
The prosecutors were allowed a writ of certiorari to review an ordinance adopted by the board of public works of the city of Elizabeth. The return to the writ shows that the prosecutors filed an application for a permit to erect a building, to be used for a mercantile business which, the stipulated facts show, was refused by the building inspector solely because it did not comply with the ordinance. The stipulated facts are that the application for permission to erect the building conforms to the requirements of the ordinance of the city of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- City of Stockton v. Frisbie & LattaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Westfield Motor Sales Co. v. Town of WestfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Gulf Refining Co. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Downey v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Austin v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.