Legal Opinion

Downey v. City of Sioux City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 22, 1929No. 39865PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C. J.-

At all times in controversy herein, plaintiff W. J. Downey was the owner of Lot 9 and the south half of Lot 10 in Block 8 in Pierce’s Addition to tlie city of Siohx City. These lots are located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Twenty-eighth and Jackson Streets, which intersect at right angles. In March, 1928, plaintiff proposed to construct and erect on said lots a ten-apartment multiple dwelling, ordinarily known as an "apartment house.” Plans and specifications were duly prepared and submitted to the proper city officials and approved. Plaintiff then made…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Inspector of Buildings v. StoklosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. City of St. Louis v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Bd. of Sup'rs of Fairfax Cty. v. HorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  3. Schoeller v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Livingston v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Sugar v. North Baltimore Methodist Protestant ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API