Legal Opinion

Fruzynski v. Radler

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 26, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

23 N.J. Super. 274 (1952)

93 A.2d 35

MICHAEL FRUZYNSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

HELEN RADLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MARY FRUZYNSKI, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 3, 1952.

Decided November 26, 1952.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.

Mr. Felix Rospond argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Rospond & Rospond, attorneys).

Mr. William V. Azzoli argued the cause for defendant-appellant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C.

In this action respondent sought the following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of Santa PerroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Farris v. Farris Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. Burlington County Trust Co. v. Di CastelcicalaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Morristown Trust Co. v. CapstickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  5. Stiles v. NewschwanderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Esposito v. PalovickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Chary v. First Savings & Loan Ass'n of Little FallsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Straffi v. Etoll (In Re Etoll)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  4. King v. GreeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API