Legal Opinion

Esposito v. Palovick

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 11, 1953PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

29 N.J. Super. 3 (1953)

101 A.2d 568

ANIELLO ESPOSITO, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF ROSE ESPOSITO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

STELLA PALOVICK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 23, 1953.

Decided December 11, 1953.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Virgil J. Lanni argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. David Schneiderman argued the cause for the defendants-respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

The plaintiff appeals from an order of the Law Division, Hudson County,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of Santa PerroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  3. Farris v. Farris Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. SAMUEL D. WASSERMAN, INC. v. KlahreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. LarsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Morgan Stanley & Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Schacht v. KunimuneAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Banc of Am. Leasing & Capital, LLC v. Fletcher-Thompson Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya v. López Montes Y OtrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API