People v. Whitler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, Acting P. J.
Defendant was found guilty of first degree murder. (Pen. Code, § 187.)1 On appeal she contends, (1) the provisions of sections 25, 28, and 29 violate her constitutional right to present a defense, or, in the alternative, sections 28 and 29 were impliedly repealed by Proposition 8, and (2) the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on her defense that she lacked the proper mental state. We shall affirm.
Defendant shot and killed her estranged common-law husband Benjamin Lancaster. On the morning before the killing, defendant had become very upset over news of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Sausalito v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. SpurlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. SailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. ArisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.