Legal Opinion

In Re Wagenhorst

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 24, 1933No. Patent Appeal No. 3059Published

1Opinion of the Court

64 F.2d 780 (1933)

In re WAGENHORST.

Patent Appeal No. 3059.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 24, 1933.

Church & Church, of Washington, D. C. (Melville Church and Clarence B. Des Jardins, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

The appellant filed his application in the United States Patent Office on April 2, 1927, for a patent on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. In Re TuckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  5. Derby Oil Co. v. White Star Refining Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API