Legal Opinion

Harnau v. Haight

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1915No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Case by Peter Harnau against Louis P. Haight for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff on the evening of October 27, 1913. At the time of the accident he was riding a bicycle and going east on the south side of Western avenue, in the city of Muskegon. The defendant was also going east on the same side of the street with his automobile, and following the plaintiff. It was about 6 o’clock in the evening, and so dark that the street lamps had been lighted. The day had been cloudy, and some rain had fallen. The plaintiff claims *602that the defendant was driving very rapidly, without any lights on his car,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Guggenheim v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wright v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Line v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fisher v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Spencer v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  4. Wicker v. North States Construction Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API