Legal Opinion
State v. Romo
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1947No. 971PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Justice.
Appellants Andrew N. Romo, Joe N. Romo (brothers) and Albert Barbo Cruz, Jr., by information, were jointly charged with the crime of forcible rape, a felony, upon one - (name omitted). By a separate information, appellant Reynaldo J. Abril was charged with the same offense growing out of the identical occurrence from which the charge originated against the other appellants. By stipulation in the lower court the two cases were consolidated for trial and the several defendants were tried jointly. From judgments of conviction they have appealed. We will hereafter refer to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Kinsey v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Lawrence v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1925
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. OwenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.