Sweet v. Michigan Central Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wasbteuaw. (Kinne, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is an action for damages based on the negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate. The plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $5,000. The facts are substantially as follows:
A part of defendant’s station yards or grounds at Detroit is called the “Bay City Yard,” in which is a side track called the “Bentley Siding.” On this track stands a long, low, irregular. building, called “ Bentley’s Oil Works,” or “Sheds.” This side track is constructed and used for the Bentley oil works, and nothing else. It is 47 feet from the switch to the south end of the building. The length of a car is 34 feet.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Illick v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Robel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
3Cited by22 opinions
- Judis v. Borg-Warner CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- McCabe v. Montana Central Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Sterling v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Sweetland v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Eastman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.