Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Romano

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 19, 1965No. Crim. A. Nos. 62-19, 62-32PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

241 F.Supp. 933 (1965)

UNITED STATES of America

v.

Frank ROMANO and Anthony DiPietro.

UNITED STATES of America

v.

Samuel ROSENCRANZ.

Crim. A. Nos. 62-19, 62-32.

United States District Court D. Maine, S. D.

May 19, 1965.

Alton A. Lessard, U. S. Atty., William E. McKinley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Me., for plaintiff.

Casper Tevanian, Ralph I. Lancaster, Jr., Portland, Me., Joseph J. Balliro, Boston, Mass., for defendants.

GIGNOUX, District Judge.

Defendants Anthony DiPietro, Frank Romano and Samuel Rosencranz were convicted, following a jury verdict, of various offenses relating to the operation of an…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. United States v. David LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1972
  4. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. State v. CampbellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API