Legal Opinion
Candela Laser Corp. v. Cynosure, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 28, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-12640-ZPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ZOBEL, District Judge.
Candela Laser Corporation (“Candela”), the holder of several patents in the field of laser technology, brought this action against Cynosure, Inc. (“Cynosure”) and others for patent infringement, breach of contract, trade secret misappropriation and unfair competition. 1 On defendant’s motion, I ordered that the issue of liability be tried separately from that of damages. The parties subsequently narrowed the trial to infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,066,293 (the ’293 patent) and 5,109,387 (the ’387 patent) and a counterclaim of invalidity as to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- PrintGuard, Inc. v. Anti-Marking Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Articulate Systems, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Candela Laser Corporation v. Cynosure, Inc. DCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995