Articulate Systems, Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPLE COMPUTER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON GROUNDS OF INDEFINITENESS
STEARNS, District Judge.
After review of the objections to the Magistrate Judge’s well-reasoned Report, I ADOPT his Recommendation and therefore DENY Apple’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I agree with the Magistrate Judge that Apple failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that the term “higher level events” is indefinite. This is not to say, however, that Apple’s request for a claim construction hearing lacks merit. The court is inclined to hold one if the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. GuinanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014