Legal Opinion

Crown Laundry & Cleaning Co. v. Cameron

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 2523PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Respondent was engaged in the business of collecting clothes- and garments from patrons and returning the same after they had been laundered. In the doing of that work he used a Ford automobile continuously. Plaintiff brought its action in the superior court to recover the sum of $870 from the defendant, alleged to have accrued and to be owing upon contract. It secured a writ of attachment and caused a levy to be made on the automobile of defendant. Defendant appeared and moved to discharge the attachment, claiming that the automobile was exempt from execution. He filed an affidavit, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Stanton v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Medical Finance Assn. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Spangler v. CorlessUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Security-First National Bank v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. IngallsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Conlin v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API