Legal Opinion

United States v. Carroll

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 29, 1996No. 94-1177; CMR No. 9300215PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GIERKE, Judge:

A general court-martial at Fort McClellan, Alabama, composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of conspiracy (2 specifications), aggravated assault, and solicitation, in violation of Articles 81, 128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 881, 928, and 934, respectively. The approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $542.00 pay per month for 12 months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Military Review* affirmed without opinion.

We granted review of the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. WaitsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. VillarealCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. DeanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  5. United States v. RamseyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API