Legal Opinion

United States v. Dean

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 17, 1996No. ARMY 9401502PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ECKER, Judge:

Contrary to her pleas, a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant of conspiracy, willful disobedience of the order of an officer, making a false official statement, aggravated assault (one specification by a means likely to produce grievous bodily harm and one specification of intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm), and solicitation in violation of Articles 81, 90, 107, 128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 881, 890, 907, 928, and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant was sentenced to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. WeymouthCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. VigilUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. QuirozNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  2. United States v. HaysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. HaysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  4. United States v. QuirozCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  5. United States v. QuirozCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API