Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Franklin
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. O ’Gorman, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment seeking a declaration that the plaintiff, under its policy of automobile liability insurance issued to the defendants Jerry A. and Carrie Franklin, is not required to provide a defense and coverage to the said Jerry A. Franklin under the said liability policy, in respect to any judgment which might be rendered as a result of an accident which took place on the 16th day of November, 1971.
On that date, the defendant Jerry Franklin was operating a motor vehicle in which his wife, the defendant Carrie Franklin, was a passenger. This motor vehicle, while so…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Feinman v. Bernard Rice Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Feinman v. Bernard Rice Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Peka, Inc. v. KayeNew York Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
- Galpern v. General Motors Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1980
- Logan v. Exchange Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CassinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992